Through Halting a Harsh Tory Social Experiment, This Budget Definitively Outlines How Labour Will Fight the Struggle to Renew Britain

Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. People have been calling for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. Through the decisions made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for addressing child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally demonstrated what we believe in.

That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the right began immediately.

The Main Political Divide in UK Politics

The central division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to change it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the opposite side, our opponents, who favor the current system and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now confront, and win, the debate.

The Tories were given 14 years to fix things and instead, by every standard, they got far more dire. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with poor productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.

Record of Decline Under the Previous Government

Quality of life fell by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure continues.

A single budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our approach will reap dividends.

Social Security and Child Poverty

Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the effects instead of the cure.

That’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Ending the Two-Child Limit

This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For almost a decade, since it was introduced, low-income families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.

It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.

Real Impact in Local Areas

I know from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, mouldy homes, parents during the holidays relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.

Lasting Consequences of Youth Hardship

Just one in four pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This sets them up for the challenges they face during their lives: unrealized potential, economic struggles and poor health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.

Confronting child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.

That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 additional children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so acting early in the parliament was vital.

The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is abolished.

Equitable Financing for Measures

We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Final Thoughts

Equity and purpose – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and define the narrative more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s maintain it and win this fight about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the deep inequalities holding us back.

Justin Wallace
Justin Wallace

A digital artist and design enthusiast with over a decade of experience in creating compelling visual stories and mentoring aspiring creatives.